What is the consequence of a motion being ruled out of order?

When a motion is ruled out of order, it means that it does not conform to the rules or procedures established by the organization, such as bylaws or parliamentary procedure. As a result, the primary consequence is that the motion cannot be debated or voted on. This ensures that all discussions and decisions made during meetings adhere to the established guidelines, maintaining order and fairness in the proceedings. By ruling a motion out of order, the chair upholds the integrity of the meeting and prevents any actions that could disrupt proper protocol or the conduct of business.

The other options involve actions that are not relevant when a motion is declared out of order. For example, allowing a rebuttal would not make sense since there is no discussion of an invalid motion. Although revising the motion could happen in some contexts, that action occurs only if the motion is initially deemed acceptable. Similarly, the requirement for a member to sit down immediately is not a universal rule connected to a motion being out of order and largely depends on the circumstances and the chair's discretion.