What happens if a member's Point of Order is not ruled upon in a timely manner?

When a member raises a Point of Order, they are addressing a perceived violation of the rules or procedures that should be followed during a meeting. If the chair does not rule on the Point of Order in a timely manner, it is within the chair's authority to address it at their discretion whenever they choose, provided they do so before the assembly moves on to another matter that makes the issue irrelevant. This upholds the chair's responsibility to maintain order and ensure that the assembly adheres to its rules.

The other scenarios presented do not accurately represent the protocol. There is no automatic voting action or assumption of a valid motion simply based on a lack of response to the Point of Order. Similarly, if the assembly continues without addressing the Point of Order, it could lead to confusion and potential procedural errors that compromise the meeting's integrity. Thus, the most accurate understanding is that the chair retains the authority to rule on the Point of Order as they see fit.